Oh, neither Clinton nor Barack have any intention of leaving Iraq. It can't be done. Neither of them are stupid. They both know that. Of the two, I think Barack may be slightly more hawkish -- based on his harumph, harumph, let's invade Pakistan rhetoric of a year or so back.
I think Clinton has a slight edge on curtailing domestic spending. That's because she has actual policy plans. Barack has positions, but no actual plans as of yet that I've seen.
At this point it looks to me as though Barack is going to win. I'll support him, of course. But I do think Clinton's getting an unfair rap. I see that whole "she's riding her husband's reputation" slightly differently. To me she's more like the wife who put her own ambitions on ice (even though she was smarter) so she could support her husband through med school or law school -- a situation a lot of women of my generation ended up in, through no fault of their own.
I don't think the accusations of riding on Slick Willy's coat-tails is an attempt to knock her credentials (or intelligence), but instead - her personality. There is almost nothing engaging about her, especially when compared to her husband or Obama. A great leader needs some charisma, and needs to inspire loyalty (at the very least).
If you had to choose between Obama and Clinton for your own boss (asumming you have a boss, of course)... who would you choose?
And you know this... how, exactly? You've talked to the woman? Sat down and had coffee with her?
Obama's a better orator, I agree. But nobody knows anything about either candidate on a personal level. That's why they spend the Big Buck$ on campaign stratagists. By the way, campaign stratagists are not just charged with making their own candidate look good, they are similarly charged with making the other candidate look bad. Clearly Obama's stratagists are doing a better job at this than Clinton's.
As a boss I'd prefer Clinton. Definitely. She knows how to break things down into specifics which is very useful for people who are supposed to be taking directions. I have yet to see that Obama has any skill at this at all.
But like I say, I'll support whomever the Democratic candidate is. I do think Clinton's getting a bad rap, but hey! that's show biz.
I don't think I need to sit down and have coffee with someone to assess their charisma... and I'd venture to say that someone whose charisma only comes through one-on-one has no business seeking the presidency.
Assessing personality, and knowing someone on a personal level are two different things entirely. We don't need to know the president on a personal level, but how they function in public is the meat of their job. I am not basing my feelings about Clinton on anything but listening to her talk, watching her facial expressions, and lining those up with all the people I have known personally, and coming to conclusions based on my own prior experience with other humans.,
She comes off as eternally dissatisfied, entitled, and willing to play dirty. I'll concede that she certainly wants it done her way, and is very good at telling people what that is... but more than that, I have yet to see.
In Illinois, my home state, Obama was a driving force for some much needed change. Even though he isn't even a lifelong resident of the state, he broke into the Machine and even won the support of Richard Daley... in just a few years. He's got something all his own, it seems, that makes people get up and get stuff done. (Here in Illinois, Obama is partially responsible for great reforms in healthcare for children, and in making attempts at changing the laws regarding TIFs so that public school funding in large urban areas isn't taking the hit)
Well, I can see you feel very passionately about all this and I respect that.
We don't agree -- for example, I think Clinton's shown a sense of humor and her facial expressions would seem perfectly fine on a man.
But basically you and I are on the same side. No need to argue! I'll support Obama 100% if he gets the nomination (and it certainly looks as though he's going to.) Nice "talking" with you and I hope the rest of your day is great.
a good article which might explain more the policy differences between Obama and Clinton, and why more libertarian-leaning individuals like myself support him over a socialist Clinton.
Obama will reverse the politicization that has occurred in the Bush Administration's Department of Justice. He will put an end to the ideological litmus tests used to fill positions within the Civil Rights Division.
Explain to me -- in words of one syllable, of course, because as you can already tell from the fact that I don't think Barack is a combination Jesus Christ/Martin Luther King/Captain Kirk all wrapped up in one, I'm very, very stupid -- how the above is an actionable plan?
Fuck Hillary Clinton. Maybe I'll vote for fucking John McCain because you Barack supporters are certainly unnecessarily rude and arrogant, and that reflects badly on your candidate.
Uh, first off -- I have not a care in the world who you vote for, so you can get off that horse.
Secondly, I'm sorry if you think that people directing you towards information you demonstrate not having had access to with your words is somehow "rude and arrogant". I don't know how someone can feel so threatened by a web link that they find it "arrogant", but...whatever.
Finally, if you had bothered to read past the first item (very telling that you didn't choose an example from anything but the first item on the first issue heading, btw), you'd see that plenty of things on the list that describe lots of specific actions to be taken. Just because you chose one that describes a view and a standard instead of an action, doesn't mean those actions don't exist. For instance, from further down on the page:
Obama will sign into law his legislation that establishes harsh penalties for those who have engaged in voter fraud and provides voters who have been misinformed with accurate and full information so they can vote. End Racial Profiling
Obama will ban racial profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide federal incentives to state and local police departments to prohibit the practice. Reduce Crime Recidivism by Providing Ex-Offender Support
Obama will provide job training, substance abuse and mental health counseling to ex-offenders, so that they are successfully re-integrated into society. Obama will also create a prison-to-work incentive program to improve ex-offender employment and job retention rates. Eliminate Sentencing Disparities
Obama believes the disparity between sentencing crack and powder-based cocaine is wrong and should be completely eliminated.
Obama will give first-time, non-violent offenders a chance to serve their sentence, where appropriate, in the type of drug rehabilitation programs that have proven to work better than a prison term in changing bad behavior.
Those are all actionable plans, are they not?
Furthermore, he goes into much of his material in great detail -- certainly greater detail than should be necessary at this point in the race:
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
* Provide a Tax Cut for Working Families: Obama will restore fairness to the tax code and provide 150 million workers the tax relief they need. Obama will create a new "Making Work Pay" tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family. The "Making Work Pay" tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans. * Simplify Tax Filings for Middle Class Americans: Obama will dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. Obama will ensure that the IRS uses the information it already gets from banks and employers to give taxpayers the option of pre-filled tax forms to verify, sign and return. Experts estimate that the Obama proposal will save Americans up to 200 million total hours of work and aggravation and up to $2 billion in tax preparer fees.
I'm not sure why people are so invested in this "Obama's an idiot with no plans" meme that they've tried to bin on the Senator, but one thing they all have in common is that they really don't want the info once you show it to them. They'll willfully ignore it if they have to. Is it really that painful to be disabused of your fanciful notions about a candidate? You don't see pro-Obama folks saying Hillary "doesn't have any ideas", do you? They just criticize her positions and record, that's all.
Maybe it's because it's easier to patronize some young black guy, I don't know. That insulting attitude's the one you ought to worry about, not "mine".
Maybe it's because it's easier to patronize some young black guy, I don't know. That insulting attitude's the one you ought to worry about, not "mine".
Way to make assumptions. You don't know anything about me or my ethnic heretige. Do you?
Good thing you don't care who I vote for because if accusations of racism are Obama supporters' way of coping with reasonable critique, I'm definitely not voting for him.
Is that your standard response to anyone who points out an error? "you're mean, I'm taking my ball and going home!"
PLEASE -- DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA. I'm BEGGING you not to vote for him. Get as many people as you CAN not to vote for him, okay? In return, just stop saying things that are demonstrably false about him. Deal?
And btw, I didn't say YOU were racist, I said many of the people who have this patronizing attitude towards the Senator (also state Senator and Constitutional Law professor of 10 years) -- might not do so if he were an old white man. He's gone into no less detail than Dennis Kucinich or Chris Dodd (or McCain, for that matter, who doesn't even make up for the lack of detail in his personal appearances with, you know, charisma or anything) -- yet I haven't heard a peep about them. Interesting, no?
P.S.: The link at the bottom of the very page you criticized above? Goes into even more excruciating detail about the section you ridiculed.
Sorry -- all the articles I've read just say he "taught law school" for 10 years -- you are probably right, it wasn't specified. I guess I was using the term "professor" in the looser sense, not as the title "Professor".
this comes up because my understanding is that he has zero academic legal publications. a professor would be expected to publish -- the old saw is publish or perish.
a lecturer wouldn't necessarily have time or even be expected to publish. some do; some don't.
but he also didn't publish while heading up the harvard law review. most of the presidents of the harvard law review have taken the opportunity of position to publish, but not obama did not.
It might be because he went back to community organizing in the poor neighborhoods of Chicago when he left Harvard, instead of going into big-money corporate law somewhere like, say, Wal-Mart. If I was at Harvard and had big-money plans when I left, I'd be a lot more motivated to publish.
All that just makes me believe him more when he says his aspirations to the Presidency weren't lifelong.
folks headed to a corporate gig don't ordinarily give a shit about publishing. it is the academics and the wonky folks who do. i think he's in this later category. as i said, i don't know what it means.
I had a few extra minutes at work, so I looked up references to his time teaching Constitutional Law. It seems that even students and other faculty used the terms "professor" and "senior lecturer" (which was technically what Obama actually was) pretty interchangeably.
Also, here's an interview from yesterday where a top foreign policy adviser calls him "a professor of Constitutional Law" as well. Also not capitalized, of course.
But you make a valid point, as officially he did not attain full tenure as a Professor, taking a leave of absence when it was offered.
Comments
I think Clinton has a slight edge on curtailing domestic spending. That's because she has actual policy plans. Barack has positions, but no actual plans as of yet that I've seen.
At this point it looks to me as though Barack is going to win. I'll support him, of course. But I do think Clinton's getting an unfair rap. I see that whole "she's riding her husband's reputation" slightly differently. To me she's more like the wife who put her own ambitions on ice (even though she was smarter) so she could support her husband through med school or law school -- a situation a lot of women of my generation ended up in, through no fault of their own.
If you had to choose between Obama and Clinton for your own boss (asumming you have a boss, of course)... who would you choose?
And you know this... how, exactly? You've talked to the woman? Sat down and had coffee with her?
Obama's a better orator, I agree. But nobody knows anything about either candidate on a personal level. That's why they spend the Big Buck$ on campaign stratagists. By the way, campaign stratagists are not just charged with making their own candidate look good, they are similarly charged with making the other candidate look bad. Clearly Obama's stratagists are doing a better job at this than Clinton's.
As a boss I'd prefer Clinton. Definitely. She knows how to break things down into specifics which is very useful for people who are supposed to be taking directions. I have yet to see that Obama has any skill at this at all.
But like I say, I'll support whomever the Democratic candidate is. I do think Clinton's getting a bad rap, but hey! that's show biz.
Assessing personality, and knowing someone on a personal level are two different things entirely. We don't need to know the president on a personal level, but how they function in public is the meat of their job. I am not basing my feelings about Clinton on anything but listening to her talk, watching her facial expressions, and lining those up with all the people I have known personally, and coming to conclusions based on my own prior experience with other humans.,
She comes off as eternally dissatisfied, entitled, and willing to play dirty. I'll concede that she certainly wants it done her way, and is very good at telling people what that is... but more than that, I have yet to see.
In Illinois, my home state, Obama was a driving force for some much needed change. Even though he isn't even a lifelong resident of the state, he broke into the Machine and even won the support of Richard Daley... in just a few years. He's got something all his own, it seems, that makes people get up and get stuff done. (Here in Illinois, Obama is partially responsible for great reforms in healthcare for children, and in making attempts at changing the laws regarding TIFs so that public school funding in large urban areas isn't taking the hit)
We don't agree -- for example, I think Clinton's shown a sense of humor and her facial expressions would seem perfectly fine on a man.
But basically you and I are on the same side. No need to argue! I'll support Obama 100% if he gets the nomination (and it certainly looks as though he's going to.) Nice "talking" with you and I hope the rest of your day is great.
i'm no hillary fan (and i'm a rabid bill clinton hater), but i've heard she is engaging in small forums. don't know if it is true.
Barack has positions, but no actual plans as of yet that I've seen.
Which parts of the issues breakdowns on his website are you having trouble reading?
Explain to me -- in words of one syllable, of course, because as you can already tell from the fact that I don't think Barack is a combination Jesus Christ/Martin Luther King/Captain Kirk all wrapped up in one, I'm very, very stupid -- how the above is an actionable plan?
Fuck Hillary Clinton. Maybe I'll vote for fucking John McCain because you Barack supporters are certainly unnecessarily rude and arrogant, and that reflects badly on your candidate.
Uh, first off -- I have not a care in the world who you vote for, so you can get off that horse.
Secondly, I'm sorry if you think that people directing you towards information you demonstrate not having had access to with your words is somehow "rude and arrogant". I don't know how someone can feel so threatened by a web link that they find it "arrogant", but...whatever.
Finally, if you had bothered to read past the first item (very telling that you didn't choose an example from anything but the first item on the first issue heading, btw), you'd see that plenty of things on the list that describe lots of specific actions to be taken. Just because you chose one that describes a view and a standard instead of an action, doesn't mean those actions don't exist. For instance, from further down on the page:
Obama will sign into law his legislation that establishes harsh penalties for those who have engaged in voter fraud and provides voters who have been misinformed with accurate and full information so they can vote.
End Racial Profiling
Obama will ban racial profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide federal incentives to state and local police departments to prohibit the practice.
Reduce Crime Recidivism by Providing Ex-Offender Support
Obama will provide job training, substance abuse and mental health counseling to ex-offenders, so that they are successfully re-integrated into society. Obama will also create a prison-to-work incentive program to improve ex-offender employment and job retention rates.
Eliminate Sentencing Disparities
Obama believes the disparity between sentencing crack and powder-based cocaine is wrong and should be completely eliminated.
Obama will give first-time, non-violent offenders a chance to serve their sentence, where appropriate, in the type of drug rehabilitation programs that have proven to work better than a prison term in changing bad behavior.
Those are all actionable plans, are they not?
Furthermore, he goes into much of his material in great detail -- certainly greater detail than should be necessary at this point in the race:
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
* Provide a Tax Cut for Working Families: Obama will restore fairness to the tax code and provide 150 million workers the tax relief they need. Obama will create a new "Making Work Pay" tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family. The "Making Work Pay" tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans.
* Simplify Tax Filings for Middle Class Americans: Obama will dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. Obama will ensure that the IRS uses the information it already gets from banks and employers to give taxpayers the option of pre-filled tax forms to verify, sign and return. Experts estimate that the Obama proposal will save Americans up to 200 million total hours of work and aggravation and up to $2 billion in tax preparer fees.
I'm not sure why people are so invested in this "Obama's an idiot with no plans" meme that they've tried to bin on the Senator, but one thing they all have in common is that they really don't want the info once you show it to them. They'll willfully ignore it if they have to. Is it really that painful to be disabused of your fanciful notions about a candidate? You don't see pro-Obama folks saying Hillary "doesn't have any ideas", do you? They just criticize her positions and record, that's all.
Maybe it's because it's easier to patronize some young black guy, I don't know. That insulting attitude's the one you ought to worry about, not "mine".
Way to make assumptions. You don't know anything about me or my ethnic heretige. Do you?
Good thing you don't care who I vote for because if accusations of racism are Obama supporters' way of coping with reasonable critique, I'm definitely not voting for him.
Is that your standard response to anyone who points out an error? "you're mean, I'm taking my ball and going home!"
PLEASE -- DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA. I'm BEGGING you not to vote for him. Get as many people as you CAN not to vote for him, okay? In return, just stop saying things that are demonstrably false about him. Deal?
And btw, I didn't say YOU were racist, I said many of the people who have this patronizing attitude towards the Senator (also state Senator and Constitutional Law professor of 10 years) -- might not do so if he were an old white man. He's gone into no less detail than Dennis Kucinich or Chris Dodd (or McCain, for that matter, who doesn't even make up for the lack of detail in his personal appearances with, you know, charisma or anything) -- yet I haven't heard a peep about them. Interesting, no?
P.S.: The link at the bottom of the very page you criticized above? Goes into even more excruciating detail about the section you ridiculed.
Edited at 2008-02-14 01:03 am (UTC)
Sorry -- all the articles I've read just say he "taught law school" for 10 years -- you are probably right, it wasn't specified. I guess I was using the term "professor" in the looser sense, not as the title "Professor".
a lecturer wouldn't necessarily have time or even be expected to publish. some do; some don't.
but he also didn't publish while heading up the harvard law review.
most of the presidents of the harvard law review have taken the opportunity of position to publish, but not obama did not.
i'm not sure what, if anything, that means.
It might be because he went back to community organizing in the poor neighborhoods of Chicago when he left Harvard, instead of going into big-money corporate law somewhere like, say, Wal-Mart. If I was at Harvard and had big-money plans when I left, I'd be a lot more motivated to publish.
All that just makes me believe him more when he says his aspirations to the Presidency weren't lifelong.
I had a few extra minutes at work, so I looked up references to his time teaching Constitutional Law. It seems that even students and other faculty used the terms "professor" and "senior lecturer" (which was technically what Obama actually was) pretty interchangeably.
Also, here's an interview from yesterday where a top foreign policy adviser calls him "a professor of Constitutional Law" as well. Also not capitalized, of course.
But you make a valid point, as officially he did not attain full tenure as a Professor, taking a leave of absence when it was offered.
:-)